[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160630171025.GA28994@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 10:10:25 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>,
Rajaram R <rajaram.officemail@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/2] usb: USB Type-C connector class
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:38:37PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> The purpose of USB Type-C connector class is to provide
> unified interface for the user space to get the status and
> basic information about USB Type-C connectors on a system,
> control over data role swapping, and when the port supports
> USB Power Delivery, also control over power role swapping
> and Alternate Modes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
[ ... ]
> +
> +What: /sys/class/typec/<port>-partner/supports_usb_power_delivery
> +Date: June 2016
> +Contact: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> +Description:
> + Shows if the partner supports USB Power Delivery.
> + - 1 if USB Power Delivery is supported
> + - 0 when it's not
> +
> +
> +What: /sys/class/typec/<port>-partner/id_header_vdo
> +Date: June 2016
> +Contact: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> +Description:
> + If the partner supports USB Power Deliver, shows the VDO
> + returned from Discover Identity USB Power Delivery command.
> +
> + If the partner does not support USB Power Delivery, the
> + attribute is hidden.
> +
On second thought, and after merging the code (and realizing that I don't get
the raw data from the Type-C Port Manager), I am not sure if a raw attribute
is that useful here. It also doesn't provide all information either.
Would it make sense to split it into multiple decoded attributes ?
- vendor-id
[bit 0..15 of ID header VDO]
- product-type (undefined, hub, peripheral, alternate mode adapter for ufp;
passive/active for cable plugs)
Might map into typec_partner_type, but I don't see a 1:1 match.
[bit 27..29 of ID header VDO]
- alternate-mode-supported
[bit 26 of ID header VDO]
- capabilities (ufp, dfp, drp, none (?))
[bit 30/31 of ID header VDO]
- product-id
[bit 16..31 of Product VDO]
Does this make any sense ?
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists