linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 32/34] clk: u300: Migrate to clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160630192629.GQ1521@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Thu, 30 Jun 2016 12:26:29 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>
Cc:	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 32/34] clk: u300: Migrate to clk_hw based registration
 APIs

On 06/01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we
> can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in
> these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of
> consumer and provider clk APIs.
> 
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>
> ---

Applied to clk-next

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project