[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160701064240.GA19086@aepfle.de>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 08:42:40 +0200
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
To: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
Rolf Neugebauer <rolf.neugebauer@...ker.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 net-next 1/1] hv_sock: introduce Hyper-V Sockets
On Thu, Jun 30, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, Dexuan Cui wrote:
>
> > -#define AF_MAX 43 /* For now.. */
> > +#define AF_MAX 44 /* For now.. */
>
> Should this patch also change the places where AF_MAX is used,
> like all the arrays in net/core/sock.c?
Also, there are appearently two competing changes for AF_MAX, one is
yours and the other one is AF_SMC. I'm not subscribed to netdev, so its
not clear which one gets applied first.
Olaf.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists