[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <c97584a0-b5b1-8660-1e16-04c43570eca6@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:04:10 +0800
From: Yongji Xie <xyjxie@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com, aik@...abs.ru,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
corbet@....net, warrier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] PCI: Do not use IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN to identify
bridge resources
Hi Gavin,
On 2016/7/1 10:34, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 06:53:11PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
>> Now we use the IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN to identify bridge resources
>> in __assign_resources_sorted(). That's quite fragile. We may also
>> set flag IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN for SR-IOV resources in some cases,
>> for example, using the option "noresize" of parameter
>> "pci=resource_alignment".
>>
>> In this patch, we try to use a more robust way to identify
>> bridge resources.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yongji Xie <xyjxie@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Yongji, I think this doesn't have to be part of this series, meaning
> it can be sent or merged separately.
>
Seems like I give a wrong example in my changelog. The
parameter "pci=resource_alignment" would not set flag
IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN for SR-IOV resources as I replied
to you in previous patch. So this patch has nothing to do
with this series now, I will remove it as you suggested.
Thanks,
Yongji
Powered by blists - more mailing lists