[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29091648.CIZSyGWL7u@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 11:46:04 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...adcom.com>
Cc: zajec5@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, f.fainelli@...il.com,
hauke@...ke-m.de, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] dt-bindings: net: bgmac: add bindings documentation for bgmac
On Thursday, June 30, 2016 6:59:13 PM CEST Jon Mason wrote:
> +
> +Required properties:
> + - compatible: "brcm,bgmac-nsp"
> + - reg: Address and length of the GMAC registers,
> + Address and length of the GMAC IDM registers
> + - reg-names: Names of the registers. Must have both "gmac_base" and
> + "idm_base"
> + - interrupts: Interrupt number
> +
"brcm,bgmac-nsp" sounds a bit too general. As I understand, this is a family
of SoCs that might not all have the exact same implementation of this
ethernet device, as we can see from the long lookup table in bgmac_probe().
Please document the specific product numbers here that are publically
known already. Having the driver match just on "brcm,bgmac-nsp" as a fallback
is fine, so you can document that one as required for all users.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists