[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1bIyD4-0000Jw-2c@stardust.g4.wien.funkfeuer.at>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 15:10:18 +0200
From: Harald Geyer <harald@...ib.org>
To: Ksenija Stanojević <ksenija.stanojevic@...il.com>
cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Marek Vašut <marex@...x.de>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mfd: mxs-lradc: Add support for mxs-lradc MFD
Hi Ksenija!
Ksenija Stanojević writes:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> >> +static int mxs_lradc_add_device(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >> + struct mxs_lradc *lradc, char *name, int i)
> >> +{
> >> + struct mfd_cell *cell;
> >> +
> >> + cell = &lradc->cells[i];
> >> + cell->name = name;
> >> + cell->platform_data = lradc;
> >> + cell->pdata_size = sizeof(*lradc);
> >> +
> >> + return devm_mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, -1, cell, 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
> >> +}
> >
> > Please don't roll your own API.
> >
> > Use 'struct mfd_cell' like everyone else does.
>
> It has been suggested in previous reviews to use separate function to
> register mfd device, and to make mfd_cell allocate dynamically because
> struc mxs-lradc is allocated dynamically.
> But I can revrse changes and make mfd_cells allocate staticaly
> wthout separate function.
I think making mfd_cells members of struct mxs-lradc will address all
review comments.
HTH,
Harald
Powered by blists - more mailing lists