[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160701065821.59196b28@lwn.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 06:58:21 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hverkuil@...all.nl, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch, airlied@...il.com,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rdunlap@...radead.org, keithp@...thp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: flat-table directive
On Fri, 01 Jul 2016 13:44:17 +0300
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com> wrote:
> This is also one of the reasons why I so much want to keep everything
> behind one configuration file, and build everything in the Sphinx
> toolchain. To keep it all more uniform, to not duplicate stuff, and not
> deviate to some silos like we've done in the past. I think when we have
> things working, we can add dedicated config files for the select few
> things that have additional special needs. Media is probably one of
> them. But that said, I think we should be able to keep including that to
> the main documentation build too.
So this is mostly how I see things too. But it might still be worth
thinking about whether media, in particular, is special and should be
buildable as a standalone document. I can see there may be settings
where only that is wanted.
Some sort of "only build xxx.rst and see what explodes" makefile option
also seems like a useful thing to have, just as a time saver for
developers and maintainers.
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists