lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1467387466-10022-10-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Date:	Fri,  1 Jul 2016 16:37:24 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: [PATCH 09/31] mm, vmscan: by default have direct reclaim only shrink once per node

Direct reclaim iterates over all zones in the zonelist and shrinking them
but this is in conflict with node-based reclaim.  In the default case,
only shrink once per node.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466518566-30034-10-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index b524d3b72527..34656173a670 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2552,14 +2552,6 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, int order, int classzone_
  * try to reclaim pages from zones which will satisfy the caller's allocation
  * request.
  *
- * We reclaim from a zone even if that zone is over high_wmark_pages(zone).
- * Because:
- * a) The caller may be trying to free *extra* pages to satisfy a higher-order
- *    allocation or
- * b) The target zone may be at high_wmark_pages(zone) but the lower zones
- *    must go *over* high_wmark_pages(zone) to satisfy the `incremental min'
- *    zone defense algorithm.
- *
  * If a zone is deemed to be full of pinned pages then just give it a light
  * scan then give up on it.
  */
@@ -2571,6 +2563,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
 	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
 	gfp_t orig_mask;
 	enum zone_type classzone_idx;
+	pg_data_t *last_pgdat = NULL;
 
 	/*
 	 * If the number of buffer_heads in the machine exceeds the maximum
@@ -2600,6 +2593,16 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
 			classzone_idx--;
 
 		/*
+		 * Shrink each node in the zonelist once. If the zonelist is
+		 * ordered by zone (not the default) then a node may be
+		 * shrunk multiple times but in that case the user prefers
+		 * lower zones being preserved
+		 */
+		if (zone->zone_pgdat == last_pgdat)
+			continue;
+		last_pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
+
+		/*
 		 * Take care memory controller reclaiming has small influence
 		 * to global LRU.
 		 */
-- 
2.6.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ