linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 01 Jul 2016 17:02:23 -0300
From:	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc:	kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.

Am Freitag, 01 Juli 2016, 14:36:02 schrieb Dave Young:
> On 07/01/16 at 02:51pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 30 Juni 2016, 17:43:57 schrieb Dave Young:
> > > On 06/30/16 at 01:42pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > > > Am Donnerstag, 30 Juni 2016, 12:49:44 schrieb Thiago Jung Bauermann:
> > I understand that this is all somewhat subjective, so if you still
> > disagree with my points I can provide a patch set implementing the
> > change above.
> I still feel it should be changed if more callbacks being introduced,
> though you can regard it is internal api, like above comment we do not
> need to assign them seperately, the member values can be assigned
> from the beginning.

Ok, I'll implement the changes and submit a v4. Thanks for your review.

[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center