lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri,  1 Jul 2016 15:23:16 -0700
From:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:	<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>,
	Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: perform read-back check after SR lock/unlock

When programming the Status Register for performing write protect, it's
important to know the result of the operation (i.e., success or
failure). Particularly, it's possible to fail when the hardware write
protect pin (WP#) is asserted, potentially disallowing writes to the
status register. Previously, even if we weren't able to update the
status register, ioctl(MEMLOCK) and ioctl(MEMUNLOCK) would return
success.

Let's add a read-back check, to make sure that the status register was
updated appropriately. If the relevant bits weren't updated, then return
-EIO.

Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
index 14cf6ac8c0a5..9551e41699c8 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
@@ -519,12 +519,18 @@ static int stm_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 	struct mtd_info *mtd = &nor->mtd;
 	int status_old, status_new;
 	u8 mask = SR_BP2 | SR_BP1 | SR_BP0;
+	u8 wr_mask = mask;
 	u8 shift = ffs(mask) - 1, pow, val;
 	loff_t lock_len;
-	bool can_be_top = true, can_be_bottom = nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_TB;
+	bool can_be_top = true, can_be_bottom = false;
 	bool use_top;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_TB) {
+		wr_mask |= SR_TB;
+		can_be_bottom = true;
+	}
+
 	status_old = read_sr(nor);
 	if (status_old < 0)
 		return status_old;
@@ -571,7 +577,7 @@ static int stm_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 	if (!(val & mask))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	status_new = (status_old & ~mask & ~SR_TB) | val;
+	status_new = (status_old & ~wr_mask) | val;
 
 	/* Disallow further writes if WP pin is asserted */
 	status_new |= SR_SRWD;
@@ -591,7 +597,21 @@ static int stm_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 	ret = write_sr(nor, status_new);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-	return spi_nor_wait_till_ready(nor);
+	ret = spi_nor_wait_till_ready(nor);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = read_sr(nor);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	if ((ret ^ status_new) & (wr_mask | SR_SRWD)) {
+		dev_dbg(nor->dev, "read-back failure: %#x, %#x\n",
+			status_new, ret);
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -604,12 +624,18 @@ static int stm_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 	struct mtd_info *mtd = &nor->mtd;
 	int status_old, status_new;
 	u8 mask = SR_BP2 | SR_BP1 | SR_BP0;
+	u8 wr_mask = mask;
 	u8 shift = ffs(mask) - 1, pow, val;
 	loff_t lock_len;
-	bool can_be_top = true, can_be_bottom = nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_TB;
+	bool can_be_top = true, can_be_bottom = false;
 	bool use_top;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_TB) {
+		wr_mask |= SR_TB;
+		can_be_bottom = true;
+	}
+
 	status_old = read_sr(nor);
 	if (status_old < 0)
 		return status_old;
@@ -658,7 +684,7 @@ static int stm_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	status_new = (status_old & ~mask & ~SR_TB) | val;
+	status_new = (status_old & ~wr_mask) | val;
 
 	/* Don't protect status register if we're fully unlocked */
 	if (lock_len == 0)
@@ -679,7 +705,21 @@ static int stm_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 	ret = write_sr(nor, status_new);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-	return spi_nor_wait_till_ready(nor);
+	ret = spi_nor_wait_till_ready(nor);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = read_sr(nor);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	if ((ret ^ status_new) & (wr_mask | SR_SRWD)) {
+		dev_dbg(nor->dev, "read-back failure: %#x, %#x\n",
+			status_new, ret);
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ