[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1467479142-8249-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 10:05:42 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] dt/bindings: Add bindings for JC-42.4 compatible temperature sensors
Provide generic bindings for all Jedec JC-42.4 compatible temperature
sensor chips.
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
---
RFC to address:
- Is "jc-42-4" ok to use for JC-42.4 ?
- JC42.4 really specifies an SPD EEPROM with included temperature sensor.
Is "jedec,jc42-4" appropriate, or should it rather be something like
"jedec,jc-42-4-sensor" ?
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2bd604a93430
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/jc42.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+Properties for Jedec JC-42.4 compatible temperature sensors
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: May include a device-specific string consisting of the
+ manufacturer and the name of the chip. A list of supported
+ chip names follows.
+ Must include "jedec,jc-42-4" for any Jedec JC-42.4 compatible
+ temperature sensor.
+
+ Supported chip names:
+ adt7408
+ at30ts00
+ at30tse004
+ cat6095
+ cat34ts02
+ max6604
+ mcp9804
+ mcp9805
+ mcp9808
+ mcp98243
+ mcp98244
+ mcp9843
+ se97
+ se98
+ stts2002
+ stts2004
+ stts3000
+ stts424
+ stts424e
+ tse2002
+ tse2004
+ ts3000
+ ts3001
+
+- reg: I2C address
+
+Example:
+
+temp-sensor@1a {
+ compatible = "jedec,jc-42-4";
+ reg = <0x18>;
+};
--
2.5.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists