[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9859a616787673d2f36ce21d4aa0220637c55001.1467446561.git.salah.triki@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 09:05:28 +0100
From: Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc: Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>, mhocko@...e.com,
vdavydov@...tuozzo.com, luisbg@....samsung.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] fs: befs: Remove redundant validation from befs_find_brun_direct
The only caller of befs_find_brun_direct is befs_fblock2brun, which
already validates that the block is within the range of direct blocks.
So remove the duplicate validation.
Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>
---
fs/befs/datastream.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/befs/datastream.c b/fs/befs/datastream.c
index 26cc417..e224b9a 100644
--- a/fs/befs/datastream.c
+++ b/fs/befs/datastream.c
@@ -249,17 +249,9 @@ befs_find_brun_direct(struct super_block *sb, const befs_data_stream *data,
int i;
const befs_block_run *array = data->direct;
befs_blocknr_t sum;
- befs_blocknr_t max_block =
- data->max_direct_range >> BEFS_SB(sb)->block_shift;
befs_debug(sb, "---> %s, find %lu", __func__, (unsigned long)blockno);
- if (blockno > max_block) {
- befs_error(sb, "%s passed block outside of direct region",
- __func__);
- return BEFS_ERR;
- }
-
for (i = 0, sum = 0; i < BEFS_NUM_DIRECT_BLOCKS;
sum += array[i].len, i++) {
if (blockno >= sum && blockno < sum + (array[i].len)) {
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists