[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1467588428-5838-3-git-send-email-sj38.park@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 08:27:07 +0900
From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
To: byungchul.park@....com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, minchan@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
corbet@....net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] memory-barriers.txt: fix wrong section reference
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index 360faf4..5af1139 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -2035,7 +2035,7 @@ systems, and so cannot be counted on in such a situation to actually achieve
anything at all - especially with respect to I/O accesses - unless combined
with interrupt disabling operations.
-See also the section on "Inter-CPU locking barrier effects".
+See also the section on "Inter-CPU acquiring barrier effects".
As an example, consider the following:
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists