[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1467614999-4326-3-git-send-email-opensource.ganesh@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 14:49:54 +0800
From: Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, minchan@...nel.org, ngupta@...are.org,
sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mingo@...hat.com, Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/8] mm/zsmalloc: take obj index back from find_alloced_obj
the obj index value should be updated after return from
find_alloced_obj() to avoid CPU buring caused by unnecessary
object scanning.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@...il.com>
----
v2:
- update commit description
Hi, Minchan:
find_alloced_obj() already has the argument which use the obj_idx
name. So I use index as the local variable name in this function.
Is this OK?
---
mm/zsmalloc.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
index 8915a1d..92b043c 100644
--- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
@@ -1744,10 +1744,11 @@ static void zs_object_copy(struct size_class *class, unsigned long dst,
* return handle.
*/
static unsigned long find_alloced_obj(struct size_class *class,
- struct page *page, int index)
+ struct page *page, int *obj_idx)
{
unsigned long head;
int offset = 0;
+ int index = *obj_idx;
unsigned long handle = 0;
void *addr = kmap_atomic(page);
@@ -1768,6 +1769,9 @@ static unsigned long find_alloced_obj(struct size_class *class,
}
kunmap_atomic(addr);
+
+ *obj_idx = index;
+
return handle;
}
@@ -1793,7 +1797,7 @@ static int migrate_zspage(struct zs_pool *pool, struct size_class *class,
int ret = 0;
while (1) {
- handle = find_alloced_obj(class, s_page, obj_idx);
+ handle = find_alloced_obj(class, s_page, &obj_idx);
if (!handle) {
s_page = get_next_page(s_page);
if (!s_page)
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists