linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Jul 2016 11:05:04 +0200
From:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous
 mode

Hi Mark,

On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 10:53:36 +0200
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 05:47:52PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> 
> > I'm waiting for reviews or acks. AFAIR, I addressed all the comments
> > Thierry made on my v2, so I guess we're good on the PWM side, but that
> > would be good to have a review from Mark now that we agreed on the PWM
> > APIs.  
> 
> I've already have one round of review invalidated by changes in the PWM
> bits so I've been deprioritising it until it's clear that the churn
> there has stopped.  I understand things are supposed to be quieting down
> but I also have a bunch of other things to look at...

I understand, but can we still expect to have it in 4.8 (I mean,
assuming Thierry is okay taking the first 2 patching for 4.8 too)?

Thanks,

Boris