linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm: sti: fix prototypes after API change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160704133810.GF6247@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 4 Jul 2016 15:38:10 +0200
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>, kernel@...inux.com,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: sti: fix prototypes after API change

On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 03:36:57PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, July 4, 2016 3:22:30 PM CEST Mark Brown wrote:

> > I sent a pull request for the API change to the DRM people which might
> > be easier given that it's a single commit topic branch rather than the
> > whole of DRM.

> Agreed, that is probably the best way forward. Does your pull request
> also contain an equivalent of my two patches?

No, I just sent a pull request for the API change - I don't have the new
patches in my tree.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)