linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 6/9] ASoC: mediatek: add mt2701 platform driver implementation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Jul 2016 10:28:52 +0800
From:	Garlic Tseng <garlic.tseng@...iatek.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <ir.lian@...iatek.com>,
	<srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>, <tiwai@...e.de>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <koro.chen@...iatek.com>,
	<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <PC.Liao@...iatek.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 6/9] ASoC: mediatek: add mt2701 platform
 driver implementation.

On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 21:39 +0800, Garlic Tseng wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 20:13 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:43:57PM +0800, Garlic Tseng wrote:
> > 
> > > +static int mt2701_afe_i2s_set_clkdiv(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int div_id,
> > > +				     int div)
> > > +{
> > 
> > Why are we adding a set_clkdiv() operation?  I would expect the driver
> > to be able to figure things out automatically.
> > 
> > > +	case DIV_ID_MCLK_TO_BCK:
> > > +		afe_priv->i2s_path[i2s_num].div_mclk_to_bck = div;
> > > +		break;
> > > +	case DIV_ID_BCK_TO_LRCK:
> > > +		afe_priv->i2s_path[i2s_num].div_bck_to_lrck = div;
> > > +		break;
> > 
> > Especially in the case where we're configuring LRCLK, that's trivial
> > when we know the sample rate which we have to know anyway.
> 
> Oh... actually I want to say 'div_mclk_over_bck' and 'div_bck_over_lrck'
> I'll fix the naming if we decide to reserve the set_clkdiv() operation.
> (omit some comment)

Hi Mark, I recognize that we can set mclk by set_sysclk, fix bck to 64fs
and let lrck be the same as sample rate so yes we don't need set_clkdiv.

Thanks for comment, I'll fix that in the next patch.

Garlic