linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASOC: Atmel: ClassD: Simplify use of devm_ioremap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1607041701120.3790@hadrien>
Date:	Mon, 4 Jul 2016 17:01:53 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
cc:	Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@...il.com>, nicolas.ferre@...el.com,
	lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASOC: Atmel: ClassD: Simplify use of
 devm_ioremap_resource



On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:52:43PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem.  This
> > > makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
>
> > The point is that ASOC should be ASoC?  Ther aren't many patches on this
> > file, and two of the three have the same subject line as the above, but
> > with ASoC rather than ASOC.
>
> Yes, that's the case here (this is one of my pre-canned responses and I
> didn't yet figure out a sensible way to make it parameterized yet,
> should add a bit about trawling git log though).

OK, thanks.  With all the capital letters it looks odd overall, so that is
why I was wondering.

julia