[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+5yK5EJtZvPgJa1jSAxg_8ODrF3Pc8ZZ8BZePjD1tB__aeEyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 20:37:19 +0530
From: Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, nicolas.ferre@...el.com,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, perex@...ex.cz,
tiwai@...e.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASOC: Atmel: ClassD: Simplify use of devm_ioremap_resource
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:52:43PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>> On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>>> > Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem. This
>>> > makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
>>
>>> The point is that ASOC should be ASoC? Ther aren't many patches on this
>>> file, and two of the three have the same subject line as the above, but
>>> with ASoC rather than ASOC.
>>
>> Yes, that's the case here (this is one of my pre-canned responses and I
>> didn't yet figure out a sensible way to make it parameterized yet,
>> should add a bit about trawling git log though).
>
> Sorry for the error. I'll send a v2.
>
> Amitoj
I see the patch has already been applied with the corrected subject line.
Amitoj
Powered by blists - more mailing lists