[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1467653810.2224.77.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 19:36:50 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: gabriel.fernandez@...com
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, patrice.chotard@...com,
alexandre.torgue@...com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drivers: reset: Add STM32 reset driver
Hi Gabriel,
Am Montag, den 04.07.2016, 15:47 +0200 schrieb gabriel.fernandez@...com:
> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
Isn't Maxime the author of this driver?
> The STM32 MCUs family IPs can be reset by accessing some registers
> from the RCC block.
>
> The list of available reset lines is documented in the DT bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
> ---
> drivers/reset/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/reset/reset-stm32.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 114 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/reset/reset-stm32.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/Makefile b/drivers/reset/Makefile
> index 03dc1bb..3776b7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/reset/Makefile
[...]
> +static const struct reset_control_ops stm32_reset_ops = {
> + .assert = stm32_reset_assert,
> + .deassert = stm32_reset_deassert,
Are the registers not readable, or did you choose not to
implement .status on purpose?
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists