linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <17900570.or1ekOzmja@avalon>
Date:	Mon, 04 Jul 2016 23:30:18 +0300
From:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"

On Monday 04 Jul 2016 15:16:40 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
> > This reverts commit 923b93e451db876d1479d3e4458fce14fec31d1c.
> 
> Laurent, can we have you comment on this?
> 
> Getting close to v4.7 final so we need to quickly see if
> this is the solution or if it will cause further regressions on
> your side if I revert it...

Given that the offending patch dates from October 2015, why is the v4.7 
schedule an issue ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart