linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Jul 2016 08:14:52 +0200
From:	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To:	Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@...il.com>
Cc:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: CSeq 0 is a valid CSeq



Le 04/07/2016 à 07:48, Liping Zhang a écrit :
> 2016-07-01 17:48 GMT+08:00 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>:
>> Do not drop packet when CSeq is 0 as 0 is also a valid value for CSeq.
>>
>> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c
>> @@ -1368,6 +1368,7 @@ static int process_sip_response(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int protoff,
>>         struct nf_conn *ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
>>         unsigned int matchoff, matchlen, matchend;
>>         unsigned int code, cseq, i;
>> +       char buf[21];
>>
>>         if (*datalen < strlen("SIP/2.0 200"))
>>                 return NF_ACCEPT;
>> @@ -1382,8 +1383,13 @@ static int process_sip_response(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int protoff,
>>                 nf_ct_helper_log(skb, ct, "cannot parse cseq");
>>                 return NF_DROP;
>>         }
>> -       cseq = simple_strtoul(*dptr + matchoff, NULL, 10);
>> -       if (!cseq) {
>
> I think there is no need to convert simple_strtoul to kstrtouint, add
> a further check seems better?
> Like this:
>  -       if (!cseq) {
> +       if (!cseq && *(*dptr + matchoff) != '0') {
>

And what about an invalid CSeq that would look like CSeq: 0abzk852 ?
Should we check it is 0 + space instead ?

>> +       if (matchlen > sizeof(buf) - 1) {
>> +               nf_ct_helper_log(skb, ct, "cannot parse cseq (too big)");
>> +               return NF_DROP;
>> +       }
>> +       memcpy(buf, *dptr + matchoff, matchlen);
>> +       buf[matchlen] = 0;
>> +       if (kstrtouint(buf, 10, &cseq)) {
>>                 nf_ct_helper_log(skb, ct, "cannot get cseq");
>>                 return NF_DROP;
>>         }