[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160705062736.GL16643@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:27:36 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ettore Chimenti <ettore.chimenti@...o.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: imx6sx: Add UDOO Neo support
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 06:04:09AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> +&iomuxc {
> + imx6sx-udoo-neo {
There is no need for this machine group. Please just put the pinctrl
groups directly into &iomuxc { }.
> + pinctrl_enet1: enet1grp {
> + fsl,pins =
> + <MX6SX_PAD_ENET1_CRS__GPIO2_IO_1 0xa0b1>,
> + <MX6SX_PAD_ENET1_MDC__ENET1_MDC 0xa0b1>,
It's unusual to write pinmuxes this way. The usual form is to write it
in a single array. (Not sure I'm using the right term here.) Having said
that I like it your way, but still it should (IMHO) get a more official
blessing.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists