linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZFUjFUApC-pZEjw7O54uCeivEvkjEBah_eq1x4nhnv+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:54:36 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:

> As we're not dealing with a v4.7 regression that would need to be applied this
> week, can't you propose a proper fix instead of a revert ?

AFAICT the proper fix is to simply move the gpiod_request() sites earlier,
I can propose something if that's all right?

Yours,
Linus Walleij