[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <577B5F28.1010905@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 09:18:00 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com, javier@....samsung.com,
pankaj.dubey@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] rtc: s3c: Remove unnecessary call to disable
already disabled clock
On 07/04/2016 01:03 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> At the end of s3c_rtc_probe(), s3c_rtc_disable_clk() being called with rtc
> clock already disabled, which looks extra and unnecessary call.
> Lets clean it up.
Does not look right. Till that place, the clocks are enabled. Then
s3c_rtc_setaie() is called which expects that clocks are disabled...
otherwise counters get mixed.
So overall this looks like wrong approach unless I am missing something?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
>
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
> index d01ad7e..b083840 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
> @@ -577,8 +577,6 @@ static int s3c_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> s3c_rtc_setfreq(info, 1);
>
> - s3c_rtc_disable_clk(info);
> -
> return 0;
>
> err_nortc:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists