[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <577B660D.50908@iommu.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:47:25 +0800
From: Wan Zongshun <vw@...mu.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Wan Zongshun <mcuos.com@...il.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] irqchip: add irqchip driver for nuc900
On 2016年06月29日 23:27, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday, June 25, 2016 6:37:20 PM CEST Wan Zongshun wrote:
>> +#define IRQ_WDT W90X900_IRQ(1)
>> +#define IRQ_WWDT W90X900_IRQ(2)
>> +#define IRQ_LVD W90X900_IRQ(3)
>> +#define IRQ_EXT0 W90X900_IRQ(4)
>> +#define IRQ_EXT1 W90X900_IRQ(5)
>> +#define IRQ_EXT2 W90X900_IRQ(6)
>> +#define IRQ_EXT3 W90X900_IRQ(7)
>> +#define IRQ_EXT4 W90X900_IRQ(8)
>> +#define IRQ_EXT5 W90X900_IRQ(9)
>> +#define IRQ_EXT6 W90X900_IRQ(10)
>
> I'd suggest dropping the list, the contents are now in the dts.
Do you think I should put one irqmap header file into this
/arch/arm/boot/dts/include/dt-bindings folder, or I should removed those
irqnumber map anywhere, just hardcode the irqnumber in dts file?
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/include/mach/nuc970-regs-aic.h b/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/include/mach/nuc970-regs-aic.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..7a77016
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/include/mach/nuc970-regs-aic.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
>> +#ifndef __ASM_ARCH_REGS_AIC_H
>> +#define __ASM_ARCH_REGS_AIC_H
>> +
>> +/*NUC970 AIC regs*/
>> +
>> +#define REG_AIC_SCR1 0x00
>> +#define REG_AIC_SCR2 0x04
>> +#define REG_AIC_SCR3 0x08
>> +#define REG_AIC_SCR4 0x0C
>> +#define REG_AIC_SCR5 0x10
>
> And like the clk driver, these should all be in the irqchip driver instead
> of a separate header.
Ok, changed.
>
>> +
>> +static void __iomem *aic_base;
>> +static struct irq_domain *aic_domain;
>> +#define MAKE_HWIRQ(irqnum) (irqnum)
>
> The macro appears to be unused.
removed it.
>
>> +static void nuc970_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
>> +{
>> + if (d->irq < 32)
>> + __raw_writel(1 << (d->irq), aic_base + REG_AIC_MDCR);
>> + else
>> + __raw_writel(1 << (d->irq - 32), aic_base + REG_AIC_MDCRH);
>> +}
>
> writel()
>
> Arnd
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists