[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <577B8166.8060208@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:14:06 +0530
From: "pankaj.dubey" <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com, javier@....samsung.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] rtc: s3c: Add s3c_rtc_{enable/disable}_clk in
s3c_rtc_setfreq()
Hi Alim,
On Tuesday 05 July 2016 02:22 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>
>
> On 07/05/2016 01:46 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 07/04/2016 01:03 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>> As per code flow it is possible that s3c_rtc_setfreq() might get called
>>> with rtc clock disabled and in set_freq we perform h/w registers
>>> read/write,
>>> which might results in a kernel crash while probing rtc driver.
>>> Below is one such case:
>>> s3c_rtc_probe()
>>> clk_prepare_enable(info->rtc_clk) // rtc clock enabled
>>> s3c_rtc_gettime() // will enable clk if not done, and disable
>>> it upon exit
>>> s3c_rtc_setfreq() //then this will be called with clk disabled
>>
>> The indentation suggests levels of calls (chain) not sequence. This
>> should be:
>> s3c_rtc_probe()
>> clk_prepare_enable(info->rtc_clk) // rtc clock enabled
>> s3c_rtc_gettime() // will enable clk if not done, and disable it
>> upon exit
>> s3c_rtc_setfreq() //then this will be called with clk disabled
>>
>>>
>>> This patch take cares of such issue by adding
>>> s3c_rtc_{enable/disable}_clk in
>>> s3c_rtc_setfreq().
>>
>> What I don't get is that you wrote "it is *possible* that
>> s3c_rtc_setfreq() *might* get called". From my understanding this will
>> happen always because src_rtc_gettime() always disables the clocks.
>>
>> Why it does not happen always?
>>
>
> Yes, you are right, it is always disabled when reaches s3c_rtc_setfreq().
> And I observed a kernel crash while testing on exynos7 platform in
> s3c_rtc_setfreq() because clock was always disabled at this point. And
> this patches fixes this issue.
>
After addressing Krzysztof's review comments, Please feel free to add
Reviewed-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
For testing on Exynos7420
Tested-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
Thanks,
Pankaj Dubey
>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists