[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160705121114.10650-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:11:14 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: of: Allow overriding the device node
From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
When registering a GPIO chip, drivers can override the device tree node
associated with the chip by setting the chip's ->of_node field. If set,
this field is supposed to take precedence over the ->parent->of_node
field, but the code doesn't actually do that.
Commit 762c2e46c059 ("gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and
struct gg_data") exposes this because it now no longer matches on the
GPIO chip's ->of_node field, but the GPIO device's ->of_node field that
is set using the procedure described above.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 47a3cc0e437b..eae7664b2723 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1047,13 +1047,14 @@ int gpiochip_add_data(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data)
if (chip->parent) {
gdev->dev.parent = chip->parent;
gdev->dev.of_node = chip->parent->of_node;
- } else {
+ }
+
#ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
/* If the gpiochip has an assigned OF node this takes precedence */
- if (chip->of_node)
- gdev->dev.of_node = chip->of_node;
+ if (chip->of_node)
+ gdev->dev.of_node = chip->of_node;
#endif
- }
+
gdev->id = ida_simple_get(&gpio_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
if (gdev->id < 0) {
status = gdev->id;
--
2.8.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists