linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZQnQEZmvtadVZUE8_XN-w0zrk+aTKvFC-fyA3wrirTmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:50:52 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: Split GPIO flags parsing and GPIO configuration"

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:

> Your call. :)

The patch is on my fixes branch and will go to Torvalds
by the end of the week unless I'm convinced otherwise ...

It turns out the patch is very isolated and doesn't collide with
any gpio development since 4.4 (which is impressive in itself)
so reverting is not a problem at all, as I thought earlier.

Yours,
Linus Walleij