[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160705143423.GA6247@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 16:34:23 +0200
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Milo Kim <milo.kim@...com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>,
Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
Stephen Barber <smbarber@...omium.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Ajit Pal Singh <ajitpal.singh@...com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>, kernel@...inux.com,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/14] regulator: pwm: Support extra continuous mode
cases
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:13:21AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> The continuous mode allows one to declare a PWM regulator without having
> to declare the voltage <-> dutycycle association table. It works fine as
> long as your voltage(dutycycle) function is linear, but also has the
> following constraints:
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists