[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160705184723.GA6976@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 21:47:23 +0300
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>,
Rajaram R <rajaram.officemail@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/2] usb: USB Type-C connector class
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:45:02AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 07/04/2016 10:11 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> [ ... ]
>
> > > > We should not forget also that the userspace can never rely on those
> > > > details because of the fact that they simply will not always be
> > > > available.
> > > >
> > > On the other side, not being able to rely on a well defined ABI makes the
> > > ABI much less useful.
> >
> > What do we do about this?
> >
> I'll have to think about it. Unfortunately, I'll have to put this on the
> back-burner for the time being. My primary problem is that I need
> a functional driver _now_ (ie by the end of this week), to meet an
> upcoming deadline. Due to to the locking problem, I can not rely on the
> typec infrastructure ... meaning I have to take two steps back and get
> my code working with the Android infrastructure (which, coincidentally,
> does not require locking and thus doesn't have all the resulting
> limitations and complexities).
That is unfortunate.
I added a commit where I remove the lock completely (at least for
now) to my github.
Cheers,
--
heikki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists