[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17652.1467748397@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 20:53:17 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/24] rxrpc: Dup the main conn list for the proc interface
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to just code the proc stuff to walk whatever
> table the rest of the stack uses to hold all of the connections
> as TCP et al. do?
I should also mention that this is an intermediate step. Splitting out the
procfs list makes it easier to fix the reap lists. I can always make the proc
code do something different once the reap fixes have settled down.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists