[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <577CB786.8000902@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:47:18 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
paulus@...ba.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, waiman.long@....com,
will.deacon@....com, boqun.feng@...il.com, dave@...olabs.net,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
xen-devel-request@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
On 06/07/16 08:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>> change fomr v1:
>> a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted
>> skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro.
>> add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner.
>> add more comments
>> thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion.
>>
>> This patch set aims to fix lock holder preemption issues.
>>
>> test-case:
>> perf record -a perf bench sched messaging -g 400 -p && perf report
>>
>> 18.09% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] osq_lock
>> 12.28% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] rwsem_spin_on_owner
>> 5.27% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] mutex_unlock
>> 3.89% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] wait_consider_task
>> 3.64% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] _raw_write_lock_irq
>> 3.41% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] mutex_spin_on_owner.is
>> 2.49% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] system_call
>>
>> We introduce interface bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) and use it in some spin
>> loops of osq_lock, rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner.
>> These spin_on_onwer variant also cause rcu stall before we apply this patch set
>>
>
> Paolo, could you help out with an (x86) KVM interface for this?
Xen support of this interface should be rather easy. Could you please
Cc: xen-devel-request@...ts.xenproject.org in the next version?
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists