[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160706113615.GB26517@krava>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 13:36:15 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pi3orama@....com,
lizefan@...wei.com, He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 2/8] perf evlist: Introduce aux evlist
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 06:20:03AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
SNIP
> +struct perf_evlist *perf_evlist__new_aux(struct perf_evlist *parent)
> +{
> + struct perf_evlist *evlist;
> +
> + if (perf_evlist__is_aux(parent)) {
> + pr_err("Internal error: create aux evlist from another aux evlist\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + evlist = zalloc(sizeof(*evlist));
> + if (!evlist)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + perf_evlist__init(evlist, parent->cpus, parent->threads);
> + evlist->parent = parent;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&evlist->list);
> + list_add(&evlist->list, &parent->children);
I understand there's some reason for separating maps with and
without overwrite set, but I'm missing it.. why is that?
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists