lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <577CF390.2090700@huawei.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 Jul 2016 20:03:28 +0800
From:	"Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC:	<acme@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<pi3orama@....com>, <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 5/8] perf record: Read from overwritable ring buffer



On 2016/7/6 19:38, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 06:20:06AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> +static void
>> +record__toggle_overwrite_evsels(struct record *rec,
>> +				enum overwrite_evt_state state)
>> +{
>> +	struct perf_evlist *evlist = rec->overwrite_evlist;
>> +	enum overwrite_evt_state old_state = rec->overwrite_evt_state;
>> +	enum action {
>> +		NONE,
>> +		PAUSE,
>> +		RESUME,
>> +	} action = NONE;
>> +
>> +	switch (old_state) {
>> +	case OVERWRITE_EVT_RUNNING: {
>> +		switch (state) {
>> +		case OVERWRITE_EVT_DATA_PENDING:
>> +			action = PAUSE;
>> +			break;
>> +		case OVERWRITE_EVT_RUNNING:
>> +		case OVERWRITE_EVT_EMPTY:
>> +		default:
>> +			goto state_err;
>> +		}
>> +		break;
>> +	}
>> +	case OVERWRITE_EVT_DATA_PENDING: {
>> +		switch (state) {
>> +		case OVERWRITE_EVT_EMPTY:
>> +			break;
>> +		case OVERWRITE_EVT_RUNNING:
>> +		case OVERWRITE_EVT_DATA_PENDING:
>> +		default:
>> +			goto state_err;
>> +		}
>> +		break;
>> +	}
>> +	case OVERWRITE_EVT_EMPTY: {
>> +		switch (state) {
>> +		case OVERWRITE_EVT_RUNNING:
>> +			action = RESUME;
>> +			break;
>> +		case OVERWRITE_EVT_EMPTY:
>> +		case OVERWRITE_EVT_DATA_PENDING:
>> +		default:
>> +			goto state_err;
>> +		}
>> +		break;
>> +	}
>> +	default:
>> +		WARN_ONCE(1, "Shouldn't get there\n");
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	rec->overwrite_evt_state = state;
>> +
>> +	if (!evlist)
>> +		return;
> I'd expect this check at the begining

I think even evlist is NULL the state changing is still required.
Actually, the state machine is independent with aux evlist. Even
we without overwritable evsels the state machine is still valid.
So let the state machine runs unconditionally.

> jirka


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ