[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb0672ba-4a00-f87e-9f01-31537d7497e3@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 14:44:31 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel-request@...ts.xenproject.org,
dave@...olabs.net, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
boqun.feng@...il.com, will.deacon@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, waiman.long@....com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
On 06/07/2016 10:19, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> Paolo, could you help out with an (x86) KVM interface for this?
>> >
>> > Xen support of this interface should be rather easy. Could you please
>> > Cc: xen-devel-request@...ts.xenproject.org in the next version?
> So meta question; aren't all you virt people looking at the regular
> virtualization list? Or should we really dig out all the various
> hypervisor lists and Cc them?
I at least skim the subjects.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists