[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVu-P_H7vAuzvtATPymnOyrWPy+T4FCwdvLP022qpEHag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 06:36:52 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Minfei Huang <mnghuan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: vdso: use __pvclock_read_cycles
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
> The new simplified __pvclock_read_cycles does the same computation
> as vread_pvclock, except that (because it takes the pvclock_vcpu_time_info
> pointer) it has to be moved inside the loop. Since the loop is expected to
> never roll, this makes no difference.
Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists