[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160706174655.GD45215@ubuntu-hedt>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 12:46:55 -0500
From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tycho Andersen <tycho.andersen@...onical.com>
Subject: Hang due to nfs letting tasks freeze with locked inodes
We're seeing a hang when freezing a container with an nfs bind mount while
running iozone. Two iozone processes were hung with this stack trace.
[<ffffffff81821b15>] schedule+0x35/0x80
[<ffffffff81821dbe>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0xe/0x10
[<ffffffff818239f9>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xb9/0x130
[<ffffffff81823a8f>] mutex_lock+0x1f/0x30
[<ffffffff8121d00b>] do_unlinkat+0x12b/0x2d0
[<ffffffff8121dc16>] SyS_unlink+0x16/0x20
[<ffffffff81825bf2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x71
This seems to be due to another iozone thread frozen during unlink with
this stack trace:
[<ffffffff810e9cfa>] __refrigerator+0x7a/0x140
[<ffffffffc08e80b8>] nfs4_handle_exception+0x118/0x130 [nfsv4]
[<ffffffffc08e9efd>] nfs4_proc_remove+0x7d/0xf0 [nfsv4]
[<ffffffffc088a329>] nfs_unlink+0x149/0x350 [nfs]
[<ffffffff81219bd1>] vfs_unlink+0xf1/0x1a0
[<ffffffff8121d159>] do_unlinkat+0x279/0x2d0
[<ffffffff8121dc16>] SyS_unlink+0x16/0x20
[<ffffffff81825bf2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x71
Since nfs is allowing the thread to be frozen with the inode locked it's
preventing other threads trying to lock the same inode from freezing. It
seems like a bad idea for nfs to be doing this.
Can nfs do something different here to prevent this? Maybe use a
non-freezable sleep and let the operation complete, or else abort the
operation and return ERESTARTSYS?
Thanks,
Seth
Powered by blists - more mailing lists