linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=W2JDP3EAdz9CWUKbcoCz34Mm7oCF2QCD4W45tyBOaP+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:30:59 -0700
From:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous mode

Mark,

On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 01:17:48PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>
>> Anyway, let me know if you want me to post the untested, rebased
>> patch...  Personally I'd prefer to wait for Boris's patches and the
>> land the tested version.
>
> We've got some boards in kernelci.org using PWM regulators I think, or
> perhaps someone else can test.  It does seem like a real fix so...

OK, post coming up then.  Sorry for the delay--I was on holiday the
last two days.

Note: which boards are you thinking would test this?  My grep showed
zero boards using regulator-ramp-delay with PWM regulator.  While this
is an important fix for anyone using the ramp delay, I'm not convinced
that anyone in mainline is using it.

-Doug