[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1607062055570.4083@nanos>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 20:57:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Matthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@...rot.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Subject: Re: futex: Allow FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME with FUTEX_WAIT op
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> On 06/23/2016 08:28 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> > And as a follow-on, what is the reason for FUTEX_LOCK_PI only using
> > CLOCK_REALTIME? It seems reasonable to me that a user may want to wait a
> > specific amount of time, regardless of wall time.
>
> Yes, that's another weird inconsistency.
The reason is that phtread_mutex_timedlock() uses absolute timeouts based on
CLOCK_REALTIME. glibc folks asked to make that the default behaviour back then
when we added LOCK_PI.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists