lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 08 Jul 2016 01:12:42 +0200
From:	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
	Victor Gu <xigu@...vell.com>,
	Romain Perier <romain.perier@...e-electrons.com>,
	Omri Itach <omrii@...vell.com>,
	Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
	Wilson Ding <dingwei@...vell.com>,
	Shadi Ammouri <shadi@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] clk: mvebu: Add the peripheral clock driver for Armada 3700

Hi Stephen,
 
 On jeu., juin 30 2016, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:

>> +
>> +	spin_lock_init(&driver_data->lock);
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < num_periph; i++) {
>> +		struct clk *clk = driver_data->clk_data.clks[i];
>> +
>> +		if (armada_3700_add_composite_clk(&data[i], parent_name, reg,
>> +						  &driver_data->lock, dev, clk))
>> +			dev_err(dev, "Can't register periph clock %s\n",
>> +			       data[i].name);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_onecell_get,
>> +				  &driver_data->clk_data);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		for (i = 0; i < num_periph; i++)
>> +			clk_unregister(driver_data->clk_data.clks[i]);
>
> It would be nice if we had devm_* registration in composite
> clks
>

This comment is the only one I didn't take into account in the second
version I've just sent. I agree it would be nice and I am willing to add
it. However these last days I was very busy with the birth of my last
child: I managed to find time to write this second version in time to be
merged for 4.8 but not enough to add these new function. I will try to
send a patch for it next week.

Thanks for your review,

Gregory


-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ