linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/9] mailbox: Add Amlogic Meson Message-Handling-Unit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 Jul 2016 09:57:48 +0530
From:	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
To:	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Frank Wang <frank.wang@...k-chips.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
	"open list:ARM/Amlogic Meson..." <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/9] mailbox: Add Amlogic Meson Message-Handling-Unit

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com> wrote:
> 2016-07-04 17:38 GMT+02:00 Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>:
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com> wrote:
>>> Add Amlogic Meson SoCs Message-Handling-Unit as mailbox controller
>>> with 2 independent channels/links to communicate with a remote processor.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/mailbox/Makefile    |   2 +
>>>  drivers/mailbox/meson_mhu.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>> Can we call it pdev_mhu.c or similar so that some other platform using
>> the MHU as a platform_device wouldn't have to embarrassingly call it
>> 'Meson's MHU'?  And also the replace meson with that prefix in the
>> code.
>
> Yes, it may deserve a more generic naming, but pdev_mhu is not good
> looking at all !
> What about platform_mhu ?
>
OK