[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 12:33:09 +0800
From: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>, Lv Zheng <zetalog@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Nicholas <nkudriavtsev@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ACPI / EC: Fix an order issue in ec_remove_handlers()
There is an order issue in ec_remove_handlers() that the functions invoked
in it are not invoked in the reversed order of their appearance in
ec_install_handlers(). This existing issue has been triggered by the
following commit:
Commit: dcf15cbded656a12335bc4151f3f75f10080a375
Subject: ACPI / EC: Fix a boot EC regresion by restoring boot EC
The commit invokes ec_remove_handlers() during runtime, thus uncovers this
issue. This patch fixes this regression.
Fixes: dcf15cbded65 ("ACPI / EC: Fix a boot EC regresion by restoring boot EC")
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102421
Reported-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Reported-by: Nicholas <nkudriavtsev@...il.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Nicholas <nkudriavtsev@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
---
drivers/acpi/ec.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: linux-acpica/drivers/acpi/ec.c
===================================================================
--- linux-acpica.orig/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ linux-acpica/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -1331,8 +1331,6 @@ static int ec_install_handlers(struct ac
static void ec_remove_handlers(struct acpi_ec *ec)
{
- acpi_ec_stop(ec, false);
-
if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_EC_HANDLER_INSTALLED, &ec->flags)) {
if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_remove_address_space_handler(ec->handle,
ACPI_ADR_SPACE_EC, &acpi_ec_space_handler)))
@@ -1340,6 +1338,17 @@ static void ec_remove_handlers(struct ac
clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_EC_HANDLER_INSTALLED, &ec->flags);
}
+ /*
+ * Disabling EC (transactions) after removing the operation region
+ * handler. This order is required because _REG(DISCONNECT) may
+ * access the EmbeddedControl operation regions.
+ *
+ * Flushing transactions before removing the GPE handler. This is
+ * required by the current ACPICA GPE design. ACPICA GPE will block
+ * a GPE if there is no way to handle it.
+ */
+ acpi_ec_stop(ec, false);
+
if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_GPE_HANDLER_INSTALLED, &ec->flags)) {
if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_remove_gpe_handler(NULL, ec->gpe,
&acpi_ec_gpe_handler)))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists