[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 15:29:27 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, steve.muckle@...aro.org,
francescolavra.fl@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/2] cpufreq: Handle sorted frequency tables more efficiently
On Monday, June 27, 2016 04:04:07 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> cpufreq drivers aren't required to provide a sorted frequency table
> today, and even the ones which provide a sorted table aren't handled
> efficiently by cpufreq core.
>
> This patch adds infrastructure to verify if the freq-table provided by
> the drivers is sorted or not, and use efficient helpers if they are
> sorted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists