[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 16:37:42 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@...wei.com>, Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Tianhong Ding <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@....com>,
David Woods <dwoods@...hip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64/hugetlb: clear PG_dcache_clean if the page is
dirty when munmap
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 08:09:04PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> At present, PG_dcache_clean is only cleared when the related huge page
> is about to be freed. But sometimes, there maybe a process is in charge
> to copy binary codes into a shared memory, and notifies other processes
> to execute base on that. For the first time, there is no problem, because
> the default value of page->flags is PG_dcache_clean cleared. So the cache
> will be maintained at the time of set_pte_at for other processes. But if
> the content of the shared memory have been updated again, there is no
> cache operations, because the PG_dcache_clean is still set.
>
> For example:
> Process A
> open a hugetlbfs file
> mmap it as a shared memory
> copy some binary codes into it
> munmap
>
> Process B
> open the hugetlbfs file
> mmap it as a shared memory, executable
> invoke the functions in the shared memory
> munmap
>
> repeat the above steps.
Does this work as you would expect with small pages (and for example
shared file mmap)? I don't want to have a different behaviour between
small and huge pages.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists