linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] KVM: nVMX: Fix preemption timer bit set in vmcs02 even if L1 doesn't enable it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2c360513-3ac7-3139-6614-45dfdff9646b@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:18:32 +0200
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
	Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@...el.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
	Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] KVM: nVMX: Fix preemption timer bit set in vmcs02
 even if L1 doesn't enable it



On 08/07/2016 02:38, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> 2016-07-07 22:11 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>:
>>
>>
>> On 07/07/2016 15:23, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               if (kvm_lapic_hv_timer_in_use(vcpu) &&
>>>>>>> +                     (is_guest_mode(vcpu) ||
>>>>>>>                               kvm_x86_ops->set_hv_timer(vcpu,
>>>>>>> -                                     kvm_get_lapic_tscdeadline_msr(vcpu)))
>>>>>>> +                                     kvm_get_lapic_tscdeadline_msr(vcpu))))
>>>>>>>                       kvm_lapic_switch_to_sw_timer(vcpu);
>>>>>>>               if (check_tsc_unstable()) {
>>>>>>>                       u64 offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset(vcpu,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, this is good as a fallback.  I'll try to fix it by getting the
>>>>> pin-based execution controls right but if I fail this patch is okay.
>>> I believe we still need this patch even if you implement "L1 TSC
>>> deadline timer to trigger while L2 is running" eventually, the codes
>>> you posted before:
>>>
>>>   exec_control = vmcs12->pin_based_vm_exec_control;
>>> +exec_control &= ~PIN_BASED_VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER;
>>>   exec_control |= vmcs_config.pin_based_exec_ctrl;
>>> - exec_control &= ~PIN_BASED_VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER;
>>> + if (vmx->hv_deadline_tsc == -1)
>>> +     exec_control &= ~PIN_BASED_VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER;
>>>
>>> So there is still case the preemption timer bit of vmcs02 is not set,
>>> however,  the scenario I mentioned above in kvm_arch_vcpu_load() will
>>> set it unnecessary.
>>
>> kvm_x86_ops->set_hv_timer _will_ set the preemption timer bit of vmcs02
>> if vmcs02 is the loaded one.
>>
>> This can happen if L2 has access to L1's local APIC registers (i.e. L1
>> passes the local APIC instead of emulating it, as is the case in a
>> partitioning hypervisor).  While L2 runs, it writes to the TSC deadline
>> MSR of L1.  This causes a call to kvm_x86_ops->set_hv_timer while the
>> active VMCS is a vmcs02.
> 
> Yes, in the scenario you pointed out the call to
> kvm_x86_ops->set_hv_timer while the active VMCS is vmcs02 is correct,
> however, in the scenario I mentioned in the patch description is not
> correct even if enable "L1 TSC deadline timer to trigger while L2 is
> running".

It doesn't help that you have not explained how to reproduce the
bug---this is what the cover letter and commit messages are for, too.

Your patch 1 is enough for me to boot L2 Windows 2008 inside L1 KVM 4.1.
 So I have an updated patch to handle the TSC deadline timer while L2 is
running, but I have no idea how to test its correctness.  I'll send the
patch shortly.

Paolo