[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160708185854.22e9fae9@xhacker>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 18:58:54 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
CC: <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, <lina.iyer@...aro.org>,
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <arm@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: cpuidle: make arm_cpuidle_suspend() a bit
more efficient
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:50:12 +0200 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 02:17:29PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > Dear Daniel,
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:46:28 +0200 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:15:55PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > > Currently, we check cpuidle_ops.suspend every time when entering a
> > > > low-power idle state. But this check could be avoided in this hot path
> > > > by moving it into arm_cpuidle_read_ops() to reduce arm_cpuidle_suspend
> > > > overhead a bit.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> >
> > I'm not sure the upstream merging path this patch should follow, Per my
> > understanding, I need to put it into Russell's PATCH system.
>
> Or alternatively through arm-soc
>
Got it. thanks.
Dear Arnd, Olof,
I have no pull request permission. what's your preference? Could you please
advise?
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists