linux-kernel - Re: get_nohz_timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160708114937.GB30200@lerouge>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:49:39 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
	vatikaharlalka@...il.com,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: get_nohz_timer_target?

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 11:05:58AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > Looking at kernel/sched/core.c:get_nohz_timer_target(), I don't
> > understand the change made in:
> > 
> >     commit 9642d18eee2cd169b60c6ac0f20bda745b5a3d1e
> >     Author: Vatika Harlalka <vatikaharlalka@...il.com>
> >     Date:   Tue Sep 1 16:50:59 2015 +0200
> >     nohz: Affine unpinned timers to housekeepers
> > 
> > After that change, the code now reads like this:
> > 
> > 	int i, cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > 	struct sched_domain *sd;
> > 
> > 	if (!idle_cpu(cpu) && is_housekeeping_cpu(cpu))
> > 		return cpu;
> > 
> > 	rcu_read_lock();
> > 	for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
> > 		for_each_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
> > 			if (!idle_cpu(i) && is_housekeeping_cpu(cpu)) {
> > --------------------------------------------------------------- ^^^
> > Was this supposed to be 'i' instead?
> 
> Yes. Care to send a patch?

Ah this got fixed already: 444969223c81c7d0a95136b7b4cfdcfbc96ac5bd
("sched/nohz: Fix affine unpinned timers mess")

Thanks.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx