[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160708132329.GA1640@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 15:23:29 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Fix module name collision with
powercap intel-rapl
* Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 06:06:49PM +0300, ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Since commit 4b6e2571bf00 ("x86/perf/intel/rapl: Make the Intel RAPL PMU driver modular")
> > the rapl perf module calls itself intel-rapl. That name was
> > already in use by the rapl powercap driver, which now fails to
> > load if the perf module is loaded. Fix the problem by renaming the
> > perf module to intel-rapl-perf, so that both modules can coexist.
>
> Ping?
It's in perf/urgent:
# 175a20c16fdb x86/perf/intel/rapl: Fix module name collision with powercap intel-rapl
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists