[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160708133851.GA6864@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 15:38:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry: Make thunk's restore a local label
* Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>
> No need to have it appear in objdump output.
>
> No functionality change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.S | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.S
> index 027aec4a74df..7b506f52a92c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.S
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
> .endif
>
> call \func
> - jmp restore
> + jmp .Lrestore
Btw., could we make it .L_restore to make it more readable - or does the
underscore confuse tooling?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists